ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. Public
  1. Public
  2. 国外雑誌論文

Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and SPECT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4399
https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4399
0c5eab42-2a85-46f5-a352-885ab1a387ba
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
5166.pdf 5166.pdf (577.3 kB)
Item type 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article_02(1)
公開日 2013-04-19
タイトル
タイトル Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and SPECT in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
キーワード Coronary artery disease
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
キーワード Myocardial perfusion
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
キーワード Cost–benefit analysis
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
キーワード Magnetic resonance imaging
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
キーワード Tomography,Emission-computed,Single-photon
資源タイプ
資源タイプ journal article
著者 岩田, 邦弘

× 岩田, 邦弘

ja 岩田, 邦弘

ja-Kana イワタ, クニヒロ

Search repository
Ogasawara, Katsuhiko

× Ogasawara, Katsuhiko

en Ogasawara, Katsuhiko

Search repository
書誌情報 Radiological Physics and Technology

巻 6, 号 1, p. 28-34, 発行日 2013-01-01
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1865-0333
DOI
関連タイプ isVersionOf
識別子タイプ DOI
関連識別子 10.1007/s12194-012-0165-2
PubMed番号
識別子タイプ PMID
関連識別子 22806543
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Our aim in this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to compare myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (p-MRI) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the Japanese setting. The CEA of p-MRI and SPECT was performed from the payer's perspective. The subjects were outpatients who had chest pain, had no history of myocardial infarction, and showed normal or equivocal stress electrocardiogram findings. The costs of imaging techniques and treatments were assessed with the use of reimbursements of medical fees from Japanese healthcare insurance for the year 2007. Clinical effectiveness was defined in terms of the percent correct diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Data from published studies provided probabilities for the CEA, including the sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of p-MRI and SPECT using a decision tree model and compared the two. The CERs for diagnosis of CAD by p-MRI and SPECT were 1,988.2 and 2,582.0 Japanese Yen (JPY), respectively. The CERs for diagnosis and treatment of CAD by p-MRI and SPECT were 7,066.1 and 7,172.2 JPY, respectively. At a pre-test likelihood of CAD of 20-70 %, the CERs for diagnosis of CAD by p-MRI and SPECT were 1,476.8-3,364.3 and 2,107.3-3,957.7 JPY, respectively. For outpatients with chest pain, p-MRI had good clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness compared with SPECT. In the management of patients with suspected CAD, p-MRI is as useful as SPECT.
言語 en
注記
内容記述タイプ Other
注記 Author
資源タイプ
内容記述タイプ Other
資源タイプ text
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ AM
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
ID(XooNIps)
22806543
閲覧数(XooNIps)
ダウンロード数(XooNIps)
543
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 12:44:11.883960
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3