WEKO3
アイテム
柏祐賢の農学原論と澤瀉久敬の医学概論
https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4392
https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/439217b2b711-0743-49ca-a441-0367f61a2f99
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
5158.pdf (2.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper_02(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-04-17 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 柏祐賢の農学原論と澤瀉久敬の医学概論 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 農学原論、医学概論、第三科学論、人間観、認識論と存在論 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
杉岡, 良彦
× 杉岡, 良彦 |
|||||
| 著者 ローマ字 | ||||||
| 値 | Sugioka, Yoshihiko | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
旭川医科大学紀要（一般教育） 巻 29, p. 1-19, 発行日 2013-03-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-8090 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Department of Philosophy of Agricultural Sciences has been established in Kyoto University since 1952. Suketaka Kashiwa (1907-2007), who was the first professor of this department, published a book entitled “Philosophy of Agricultural Sciences” in 1962, where he especially clarified the characteristics of “applied sciences” such as agricultural sciences, medicine, and so on. He insisted that applied sciences are not just the application of basic sciences, but they have their own purposes and methods used to unify them. For instance, applied sciences aim to clarify the rational human behaviors to realize some specific purposes (how to cure or prevent some diseases in a proper and best way). And, in order to realize such purposes, they utilize both natural sciences and social sciences, and examine whether their strategies are adequate to realize the purpose or not. Hisayuki Omodaka (1904-1997), on the other hand, was the founder of philosophy of medicine. In comparing these two types of philosophies, people came to know that both of them discussed two major issues: epistemologic one, such as philosophy of sciences, and ontological one, such as a view of a person or an essence of agriculture. On a view of a person, both Kashiwa and Omodaka have a similar perspective. For them, humans are not passive subjects who are completely determined by the external environments, but they have initiative and are self-determined. Both philosophy of agricultural sciences and philosophy of medicine reflect agricultural sciences and medicine respectively, and aim to establish better ones. In order to realize this goal, the continuous reflection of sciences and view of a person may be indispensable. |
|||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 雑誌掲載版 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | text | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
