Item type |
学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article_02(1) |
公開日 |
2013-02-14 |
タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Comparison of the Pentax-AWS airway scope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized, prospective study |
|
言語 |
en |
言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
キーワード |
Pentax-AWS Airway Scope |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
キーワード |
Nasotracheal Intubation |
キーワード |
|
|
主題Scheme |
Other |
|
キーワード |
Difficult airway |
資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
著者 |
鈴木, 昭広
Onodera, Yoshiko
Mitamura, Sayuri M
Mamiya, Keiko
Kunisawa, Takayuki
高畑, 治
Henderson, John J
岩崎, 寛
|
著者 ローマ字 |
|
|
|
Takahara, Osamu |
著者 ローマ字 |
|
|
|
en |
著者 ローマ字 |
|
|
|
Iwasaki, Hiroshi |
著者 ローマ字 |
|
|
|
en |
書誌情報 |
Journal of clinical anesthesia
巻 24,
号 7,
p. 561-565,
発行日 2012-11-01
|
ISSN |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
PISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0952-8180 |
DOI |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isVersionOf |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.007. |
PubMed番号 |
|
|
|
識別子タイプ |
PMID |
|
|
関連識別子 |
23101771 |
識別番号 その他 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
PMID: |
抄録 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Pentax-AWS Airway Scope (AWS) in comparison to the Macintosh laryngoscope during nasotracheal intubation. \nDESIGN: Prospective randomized study. \nSETTING: Operating room of a university-affiliated hospital. \nPATIENTS: 90 ASA physical status 1 and 2 adults, aged 18 to 72 years, scheduled for orthodontia surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation. \nINTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to three groups to undergo tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope (Group Mac; n = 30), AWS with its tip inserted into the vallecula for indirect elevation of the epiglottis (Group AWS-I; n = 30), or AWS with its tip positioned posterior to the epiglottis for direct elevation of the epiglottis (Group AWS-D; n = 30). \nMEASUREMENTS: Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score at the time of laryngeal exposure, time required for intubation, and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) were measured. The frequency of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness also were noted. \nMAIN RESULTS: Patient demographics did not differ among the groups. In Groups AWS-I and AWS-D, IDS scores were reduced significantly, and the percentages of glottic opening were significantly improved, compared with the Macintosh group. Time to place the endotracheal tube was significantly shortest in Group AWS-I. In one case from each group, intubation within two attempts failed and a different approach was required. \nCONCLUSION: The AWS offers better intubation conditions than the Macintosh laryngoscope during nasotracheal intubation. The AWS may be used to elevate the epiglottis both directly and indirectly for nasotracheal intubation. |
|
言語 |
en |
注記 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
注記 |
Author |
資源タイプ |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
資源タイプ |
text |
著者版フラグ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
AM |
フォーマット |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
application/pdf |
ID(XooNIps) |
|
|
|
23101771 |
閲覧数(XooNIps) |
|
ダウンロード数(XooNIps) |
|
|
|
1025 |