WEKO3
アイテム
倫理的な自然主義にとって概念分析という方法は魅力的な選択肢であるか
https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/282
https://asahikawa-med.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/28296f54e50-ebd2-4a6d-a628-79d4206f709d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
326.pdf (934.7 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper_02(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2007-03-19 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 倫理的な自然主義にとって概念分析という方法は魅力的な選択肢であるか | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題 | 倫理的な自然主義 概念分析 開かれている問い論法 Ｆ．ジャクソン ラムゼイ文 Ｍ・ | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| タイトル ローマ字 | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Ethical Naturalism and Conceptual Analysis | |||||
| 著者 |
田村, 圭一
× 田村, 圭一 |
|||||
| 著者 ローマ字 | ||||||
| Tamura, Keiichi | ||||||
| 書誌情報 |
旭川医科大学紀要（一般教育） 巻 ２２, p. 29-40, 発行日 2006-03-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0387-8090 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | lt is thought that ethical natural is one of the most influential theories of meta-ethics. But we cannot say that ethical naturalists have succeeded in the analyses of moral concepts. On the one hand, semantical naturalism has been prey G.E.Moore's open question argument(OQA)． Semantical naturalism claims that 'good'means the same as 'pleasant', but Moore's OQA exposes its naturalistic fallacy.Ontological naturalism, on the other hand, does not commit itself to the synonymy of moral and non-moral words.But even then,ontological naturalism cannot divert OQA.The story of ontological naturalism includes the a priori part and its a priori part is the target of OQA. In any case, ethical naturalists has been poor at conceptual analysis. But the situation has changed recently. Ethical naturalists realize that they cannot shelve the problem of conceptual analysis. Both F.Jackson and M.Smith commit themselves to ethical naturalism and take the problem of conceptual analysis seriously.Moral and non-moral concepts are related to each other and they form the tight-knit network. Jackson attempts the explicit and reductive style analyses of the network by appealing to Ramseyfication, while Smith tries the summary-style, non-reductive anaIyses. It is true that their philosophical attempts are instructive, but they do not succeed in reinforcing ethical naturalism. Rather,contrary to their expectations,they bring to light the trouble ethical naturalism.The lesson to be learned is that we should try non-naturalistic conceptual analysis in the spirit of moral particularism. |
|||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 出版社版 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | text | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
