| Item type |
学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article_02(1) |
| 公開日 |
2025-06-19 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Nasal breathing is superior to oral breathing when performing and undergoing transnasal endoscopy: a randomized trial |
|
言語 |
en |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプ |
journal article |
| アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
open access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 |
| 著者 |
Keitaro, Takahashi
Yuki, Murakami
Takahiro, Sasaki
Nobuhiro, Ueno
Shion, Tachibana
Junpei, Ikeda
Kenichi, Ishigaki
Masashi, Horiuchi
Moe, Yoshida
Kyoko, Uehara
Yu, Kobayashi
Yuya, Sugiyama
Takehito, Kunogi
Mizue, Muto
Katsuyoshi, Ando
Momotaro, Muto
Shin, Kashima
Kentaro, Moriichi
Hiroki, Tanabe
Nobuyuki, Yanagawa
Kazumichi, Harada
Takashi, Teramoto
Toshikatsu, Okumura
Mikihiro, Fujiya
|
| bibliographic_information |
en : Endoscopy
巻 55,
号 3,
p. 207-216,
発行日 2023-03-01
|
| ISSN |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
PISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0013-726X |
| DOI |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isIdenticalTo |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1900-6004 |
| リンクURL |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-1900-6004 |
|
言語 |
en |
| item_1716186501932 |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isIdenticalTo |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
PMID |
|
|
関連識別子 |
35835446 |
| item_5_description_33 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
BACKGROUND : Transnasal endoscopy presents a technical difficulty when inserting the flexible endoscope. It is unclear whether a particular breathing method is useful for transnasal endoscopy. Therefore, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare endoscopic operability and patient tolerance between patients assigned to nasal breathing or oral breathing groups. METHODS : 198 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo transnasal endoscopy with nasal breathing or with oral breathing. Endoscopists and patients answered questionnaires on the endoscopic operability and patient tolerance using a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 (non-existent) to 100 (most difficult/unbearable). The visibility of the upper-middle pharynx was recorded. RESULTS : Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. Nasal breathing showed a higher rate of good visibility of the upper-middle pharynx than oral breathing (91.9 % vs. 27.6 %; P < 0.001). Nasal breathing showed lower mean [SD] scores than oral breathing in terms of overall technical difficulty (21.0 [11.4] vs. 35.4 [15.0]; P < 0.001). Regarding patient tolerance, nasal breathing showed lower scores than oral breathing for overall discomfort (22.1 [18.8] vs. 30.5 [20.9]; P = 0.004) and other symptoms, including nasal and throat pain, choking, suffocating, gagging, belching, and bloating (all P < 0.05). The pharyngeal bleeding rate was lower in the nasal breathing group than in the oral breathing group (0 % vs. 9.2 %; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS : Nasal breathing is superior to oral breathing for those performing and undergoing transnasal endoscopy. Nasal breathing led to good visibility of the upper-middle pharynx, improved endoscopic operability, and better patient tolerance, and was safer owing to decreased pharyngeal bleeding. |
|
言語 |
en |
| 注記 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
注記 |
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
|
言語 |
en |
| 出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
VoR |
| item_5_textarea_42 |
|
|
|
en |
|
|
© 2022. The Author(s). |
35835446.pdf (1.4 MB)
.png)
